The Core i3-4160 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-2500K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $128.87 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-4160
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 88% cheaper – $18.01 vs $146.88
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-2500K
The Core i3-4160 is better in every way
Core i3-4160 vs Core i5-2500K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, €
€18.01
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
171
96%
Min 1% FPS
114
96%
Price, €
€146.88
12%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
12%
Core i3-4160 vs Core i5-2500K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160 vs Core i5-2500K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160 vs Core i5-2500K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4160 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Not Available | MSRP | $216.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |