Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3456 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Core i3-4150
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $18.73 vs $338.95
- Up to 94% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-14900KF - $0.12 vs $1.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in God of War than Core i3-4150 - 202 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 32 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
169
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.86/FPS
6%
Price, €
€376.23
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4150 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |