In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-4130T is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $272 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 92% cheaper – $23.99 vs $296.12
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.37 vs $2.46/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 88% faster in Battlefield 6 – 120 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 88% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
64 FPS
53%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
53%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
120 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$296.12
8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
15%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
