Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2135 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Core i3-4130
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $33.28 vs $76.29
- Up to 49% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.71 vs $1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 17% better in Starfield than Core i3-4130 - 61 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €36.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4130 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |