Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4453 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 100% better in Starfield than Core i3-380M - 84 vs 42 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€671.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-380M | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |