Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 3782 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Core i3-3250
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $43.24 vs $296.35
- Up to 82% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-14700K - $0.28 vs $1.53 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 25% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3250 - 194 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 28 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
155
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7197 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
18%
Price, €
€296.35
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €296.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7197 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |