The Core i3-3240 is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $7.21 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-3240
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 15% cheaper – $39.65 vs $46.86
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-4130
The Core i3-3240 is better in every way
Core i3-3240 vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
169
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, €
€39.65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Core i3-3240 vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
