The Core i3-3240 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-8400 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $36.93 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-3240
- Up to 48% cheaper – $39.65 vs $76.58
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-8400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3240 vs Core i5-8400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
169
91%
Min 1% FPS
113
92%
Price, €
€39.65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Core i5-8400
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€76.58
51%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
56%
Core i3-3240 vs Core i5-8400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i5-8400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i5-8400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-8400
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | $182.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |