Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3431 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Core i3-3220T
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $48.21 vs $62.33
- Up to 11% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i3-12100F - $0.08 vs $0.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than Core i3-3220T - 761 vs 673 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
673
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
761
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
89%
Price, €
€69.19
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |