Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2498 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 2% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $82.86 vs $84.68
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3220 - 424 vs 374 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-3220 - $0.20 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €82.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7106 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
424
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.68
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7107 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |