Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $74.65 vs $338.95
- Up to 73% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-14900KF - $0.49 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3220 - 206 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
27%
Price, €
€376.23
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |