Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3770 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 49% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3217U - 224 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 20 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€207.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €207.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6316 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3217U | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |