Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4622 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Core i3-2120
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $135.13 vs $375.64
- Up to 58% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-14900KF - $0.63 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Fortnite than Core i3-2120 - 249 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 32 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
213
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7385 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
249
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
42%
Price, €
€375.64
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €375.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7384 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2120 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |