Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 369 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Core i3-14100F
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $81.16 vs $671.13
- Up to 87% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.43 vs $3.23 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-14100F - 208 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7153 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.23/FPS
13%
Price, €
€671.13
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7154 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-14100F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |