Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 245 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $69.19 vs $413.51
- Up to 81% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900K - $0.30 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Rust than Core i3-12100F - 269 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
233
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5839 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
269
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
19%
Price, €
€413.51
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €413.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5839 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |