Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Core i3-1125G4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 428 days newer than Core i3-1125G4.
Advantages of Core i3-1125G4
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 28 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than Core i3-1125G4 - 252 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6656 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |