Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Core i3-10300
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $88.36 vs $338.95
- Up to 69% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-14900KF - $0.73 vs $2.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10300 - 160 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 32 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€98.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €98.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.35/FPS
31%
Price, €
€376.23
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10300 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |