The Core i3-10105F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8150 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $5.41 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 7% cheaper – $68.48 vs $73.89
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-10105F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i3-10105F vs FX-8150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€68.48
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Core i3-10105F vs FX-8150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10105F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
