Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $77.75 vs $390.09
- Up to 68% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-14900K - $0.54 vs $1.70 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 59% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-10105F - 229 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
63%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7309 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
32%
Price, €
€390.09
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7309 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |