Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $68.67 vs $450.34
- Up to 80% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-13900K - $0.12 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 36% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10105F - 766 vs 564 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
564
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 406 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
766
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
20%
Price, €
€450.34
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €450.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 407 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |