Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Core i3-10105
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - $76.57 vs $175.68
- Up to 51% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-12700K - $0.18 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10105 - 470 vs 418 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 20 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
418
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €76.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6951 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
470
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
49%
Price, €
€175.68
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €175.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6952 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105 | vs | Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |