Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $74.66 vs $219.13
- Up to 60% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-14700F - $0.63 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10100 - 153 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 28 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
40%
Price, €
€243.23
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10100 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |