Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $82.87 vs $234.23
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-11700F - $0.35 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-10100 - 263 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
239
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8241 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
39%
Price, €
€234.23
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €234.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8241 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10100 | vs | Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |