Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $74.66 vs $133.89
- Up to 42% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-14400F - $0.38 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-10100 - 227 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
58%
Price, €
€148.62
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10100 | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |