In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G6900 is slower than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Nov 05, 2020
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 46 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6 – 103 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 9 5950X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
103 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
77 FPS
100%
Price, $
$344
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$52.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM4 |
46W | Power Consumption | 105W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
