The Celeron G6900 is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-7700T and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $45.05 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 50% cheaper – $45.04 vs $90.09
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i7-7700T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-7700T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€45.04
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
183
95%
Min 1% FPS
121
95%
Price, €
€90.09
49%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
47%
Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-7700T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-7700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-7700T in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G6900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
$52.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |