The Celeron G5900 is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-2500K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G5900
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 58 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-2500K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-2500K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G5900
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
99%
Price, €
€146.88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-2500K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-2500K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-2500K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G5900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G5900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $216.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
58 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| UHD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
