The Celeron G4900 is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-6300 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $9.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Celeron G4900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Up to 15% cheaper – $52.27 vs $61.28
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 2 threads
Celeron G4900 vs FX-6300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, €
€61.28
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
86%
Celeron G4900 vs FX-6300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900 vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900 vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G4900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $132.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
