The Celeron G3930T is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $125.24 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G3930T
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 78% cheaper – $35.14 vs $160.38
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3930T vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
169
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Celeron G3930T vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930T vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930T vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3930T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
