The Celeron G3930T is a clear winner – it's a faster gaming CPU than the FX-6300 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $17.13 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G3930T
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 33% cheaper – $35.14 vs $52.27
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3930T vs FX-6300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
169
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Celeron G3930T vs FX-6300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930T vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930T vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3930T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $132.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
