The Celeron G3930T is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $11.72 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G3930T
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 25% cheaper – $35.14 vs $46.86
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3930T vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
169
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Celeron G3930T vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930T vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930T vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3930T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
