The Celeron G3930T is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-4570S, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $177.47 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G3930T
- Up to 83% cheaper – $35.14 vs $212.61
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-4570S
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3930T vs Core i5-4570S for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
169
94%
Min 1% FPS
113
95%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Core i5-4570S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, €
€212.61
16%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
17%
Celeron G3930T vs Core i5-4570S in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930T vs Core i5-4570S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930T vs Core i5-4570S in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-4570S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3930T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4570S |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |