In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G1840 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G1840 vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1840
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
61 FPS
68%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
68%
Price, $
$16.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1840 vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1840 vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1840
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1840 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
