Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 3046 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4500 - $28.82 vs $71.15
- Up to 55% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 4500 - $0.19 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4500 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 4500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1820 - 170 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
155
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
Buy for €71.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Ryzen 5 4500 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |