Buy on Amazon
€262.78
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $549
Availability
MSRP $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2894 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1610T - 203 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 24 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€262.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-core, 24-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €262.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
