Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 3746 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 4500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron B815 - 259 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 12 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €71.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Ryzen 5 4500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |