Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2483 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 51% better in Starfield than Celeron B815 - 62 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |