Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2848 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 15% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron B815 - 211 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 20 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€509.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €509.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 443 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |