The Celeron B800 is at least much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-661. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron B800
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 35 vs 87 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-661
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron B800 vs Core i5-661 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron B800
Jun 19th, 2011
Average FPS
163
97%
Min 1% FPS
110
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-661
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
168
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, €
€72.06
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Celeron B800 vs Core i5-661 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B800 vs Core i5-661 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B800 vs Core i5-661 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B800
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
45%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-661
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.33 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron B800 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-661 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $196.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
35 W | Power Consumption | 87 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
