The Celeron 887 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 887
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 2 threads
Celeron 887 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Average FPS
163
74%
Min 1% FPS
110
76%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
219
100%
Min 1% FPS
144
100%
Price, €
€629.73
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.87/FPS
100%
Celeron 887 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 887 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 887 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
36%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 887 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $699.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
17 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.7 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR5 @ 5200 MHz |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
