The Celeron 847 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-11900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-11900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Celeron 847 vs Core i9-11900K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Average FPS
161
78%
Min 1% FPS
109
80%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
207
100%
Min 1% FPS
136
100%
Price, €
€281.06
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Celeron 847 vs Core i9-11900K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Core i9-11900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Core i9-11900K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
31%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 847 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-11900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $539.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
