The Celeron 4205U is at least much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3770K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4205U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 15 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-3770K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4205U vs Core i7-3770K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
165
96%
Min 1% FPS
111
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
172
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, €
€63.05
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Celeron 4205U vs Core i7-3770K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i7-3770K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i7-3770K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4205U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $313.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Whiskey Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
15 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |