The Celeron 4205U is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-2500K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4205U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-2500K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-2500K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
165
96%
Min 1% FPS
111
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, €
€146.88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-2500K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-2500K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-2500K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4205U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $216.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Whiskey Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
15 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
