Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2846 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 17 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 14% better in Rocket League than Celeron 1037U - 759 vs 667 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 32 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
759
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€309.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €309.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1037U | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |