Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3922 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Celeron 1000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron 1000M - 348 vs 294 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 32 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
348
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€375.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €375.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6516 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |