Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 1157 days newer than Ryzen 5 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3500U - 201 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 15 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
100%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Chagall | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |