Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 2787 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield 2042 than Pentium G3250 - 174 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Pentium |
Chagall | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |