Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 357 days newer than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10105F - 164 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1633 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Chagall | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |