Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is 2738 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 192 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX - 135 vs 280 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2118
100%
Multi-Core
15921
100%
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
922
43.53163361661945%
Multi-Core
3652
22.93825764713272%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Chagall | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 135 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
