Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is 839 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Athlon 3000G - 141 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
131
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2028
100%
Multi-Core
13045
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Chagall | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |